low end?

Originally posted by hondaman-iac
ok spooge here is the deal:

4th and 5th generation: DX/LX same engine, EX/SE better one
6th generation: LX/EX same engine, and the DX gets a crappy one


v6 does not count.

My point is this: the 5th gen LX had either 120 or 135 hp non-vtec, which sounds somewhat similar to the 6th gen DX that gets the "crappy" 135 hp non-vtec. I'm not sure on the displacement, weight, or any other spec of the 5th gen LX vs the 6th gen DX, but they do have comparable power. Equally the 5th gen EX had what, 145 hp vtec? Sounds similar to the 150 hp vtec in the 6th gen.

From that I draw the conclusion that having a 6th gen DX compared to LX or EX can't be much worse than having a 5th gen LX as compared to the EX.

And they are all faster than my '88 Volvo.

b