.:HSTuners::

drdingo21 · 03-24-2003, 01:27 PM

sigh...it never fails....im talking about the 95+ v6 ones...Cmon guys. the v6 ones suck ass. i don't know how reliabe this site is but its what i found when i did a search.
http://www.car-videos.com/performanc....asp?dist=1320

the 2000 v6 mustang runs 16.50s. Stock my car ran a 16.80, that was before the exhast and short throw shifter....Not to metion ive done it more than once.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

03-24-2003, 01:27 PM	#12
drdingo21 Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Elkhart, IN Age: 42 Posts: 1,642	sigh...it never fails....im talking about the 95+ v6 ones...Cmon guys. the v6 ones suck ass. i don't know how reliabe this site is but its what i found when i did a search. http://www.car-videos.com/performanc....asp?dist=1320 the 2000 v6 mustang runs 16.50s. Stock my car ran a 16.80, that was before the exhast and short throw shifter....Not to metion ive done it more than once.