.:HSTuners::::Hondas Wanted:: |
![]() |
#1 |
Posts: n/a
|
wouldnt this be true
ok i was looking at a website dont remember which one and they said that the 97-98 type r did not have a/c well if thats true then it would be faster than the 2000 type r or is the website wrong
thnx |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Posts: n/a
|
Re: wouldnt this be true
Quote:
I wasn't aware that ANY type r's have ever had a/c.....definetely the 97-98's didn't, but I didn't think the 00's had it either. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Posts: n/a
|
true the 97-98 did not have a/c...the 00's however do have a/c the still lay the same hp numbers though
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Posts: n/a
|
more than i know i thought they all had ac
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
thanks 4 clearing that up.....and where did u get ur signature picture??? thats hillarious!!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
well so the 97-98 would be faster right? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
4th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Boulder, CO
Age: 44
Posts: 830
|
The reason they have the same hp numbers is that manufacturers rate hp at the flywheel rather than the wheels, before any parasitic drag. However, the 97-98, lacking a/c, would put down more power to the wheels.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|