.:HSTuners::::Hondas Wanted:: |
11-07-2002, 03:39 AM
|
#1 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
0-60 times
What does a Stock 92-95 model Civic coupe 1.5 do 0-60 and quarter mile. also what is its top speed?
|
|
|
11-08-2002, 11:19 AM
|
#2 |
|
4th Gear
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CONNETICUT WOOT!
Age: 40
Posts: 619
|
i cant be sure about this but a rough guess from at the track performances i oversaw can be guessed at about mid to high 12 second 0-60's and mid to high 18 second 1/4 mile for autos and about low to mid 11's for 5spd and low 18's 1/4 mile.
__________________
 2640lbs with full tank minus me w/ 302cid check out the crustang and 88 cherokee @ www.cardomain.com/id/ford50forlife |
|
|
|
11-08-2002, 11:22 AM
|
#3 |
|
It has 4 Doors...
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Fredericksburg,Va
Age: 49
Posts: 907
|
for top speed you will find it shutting off fuel at about 120 or so...
 |
|
|
|
|
11-08-2002, 01:42 PM
|
#4 | ||
|
Zoom-Zoom
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,924
|
Are talking about 0-60MPH? Or 0-60FT times?
Quote:
I don't think they are that slow. I'd believe 9-10 0-60MPH & high 17's. Then again I've not seen a completely stock 5th gen run at the track.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
11-08-2002, 02:25 PM
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
0-60MPH times.
12 Seconds!!!! i was kinda hoping it would at least be under 10 seconds. LOL, spose it is a auto 1.5 how would i knock it down to around 9's Induction kit, and full exhaust? or am i still dreaming. |
|
|
|
11-08-2002, 02:56 PM
|
#6 | ||
|
Zoom-Zoom
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,924
|
Quote:
You asked about 92-95 Civics...Yet you have a 96? The times are different.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
11-08-2002, 04:32 PM
|
#7 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
nah it was registered in 96 but its a last of the line sort of thing. but its a 92-95 EG model. it confuses everyone. lol.
|
|
|
|
11-08-2002, 05:28 PM
|
#8 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
well mine runs 8's 0-60 and well just look what i got
|
|
|
|
11-08-2002, 05:59 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Insomniac Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: OR
Age: 43
Posts: 11,142
|
Quote:
How did you measure that?
__________________
1994 Accord EX coupe --Need hosting for your pics on HST? PM me...-- |
|
|
|
|
|
11-08-2002, 10:28 PM
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oviedo, FL
Age: 42
Posts: 3,195
|
so your 102hp DX with added weight is running an 8s 0-60? ok.
 |
|
|
|
|
11-08-2002, 11:40 PM
|
#11 |
|
Yahoo Watashi wa kattaze!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Meanwhile, up in The D...
Age: 40
Posts: 10,579
|
should be somewhere between 9-11 seconds...thats real rough but I think my 97 coupe gets to 60 in 9.something maybe 10.
|
|
|
|
|
11-09-2002, 12:12 AM
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Elkhart, IN
Age: 41
Posts: 1,642
|
i know my ex doesn't take 12 seconds to get to 60...probly more like 9-10
|
|
|
|
|
11-09-2002, 10:39 AM
|
#13 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
So i could get it down to 9's with a induction kit and exhaust?
|
|
|
|
11-09-2002, 01:57 PM
|
#14 | |
|
Insomniac Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: OR
Age: 43
Posts: 11,142
|
Quote:
You don't need FI to get into the 9s 0-60. Just bolt ons would do IMO.
__________________
1994 Accord EX coupe --Need hosting for your pics on HST? PM me...-- |
|
|
|
|
|
11-09-2002, 02:43 PM
|
#15 | ||
|
Zoom-Zoom
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,924
|
Quote:
I think he means cold air induction (as in AEM).
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
11-09-2002, 03:25 PM
|
#16 | |
|
Insomniac Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: OR
Age: 43
Posts: 11,142
|
Quote:
Oh yeah, oops. A CAI and exhaust should be fine for 9s in the 0-60 I think.
__________________
1994 Accord EX coupe --Need hosting for your pics on HST? PM me...-- |
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2002, 06:25 AM
|
#17 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
That just shows how restrictive the origanal air filter and exhaust is. thanks guys
|
|
|
|
11-10-2002, 03:09 PM
|
#18 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Az
Age: 43
Posts: 3,804
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2002, 03:21 PM
|
#19 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
what times are you doing 0-60 AzCivic?
9's |
|
|
|
11-10-2002, 04:58 PM
|
#20 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
12.17
|
|
|
|
11-10-2002, 08:53 PM
|
#21 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,584
|
Well i don't think this really counts but i wanted to know so i tested it myself. Had my friend with a NON-digital watch clock my time. So it was my car, loaded with the both of us, and my hockey bag. The car wasn't in race mode, but we tried anyways...
roughly 14 seconds. I'm sure if i had a digital timer, and the car was in race mode, then it's be about 12.
__________________
RECENTLY UPDATED!!! 5-20-04 http://63.249.135.19/hdrive/car/index.htm |
|
|
|
|
11-11-2002, 07:22 PM
|
#22 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Az
Age: 43
Posts: 3,804
|
Quote:
Heck if I know, maybe I should get a G-Tech. |
|
|
|
|
|
11-11-2002, 07:54 PM
|
#23 |
|
Yahoo Watashi wa kattaze!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Meanwhile, up in The D...
Age: 40
Posts: 10,579
|
gtec? what you dont like to guess by the seat of your jeans and count seconds using your cd player??
 |
|
|
|
|
11-12-2002, 01:08 AM
|
#24 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Az
Age: 43
Posts: 3,804
|
I pretend its about 4.5 seconds, then I wake up.
|
|
|
|
|
11-12-2002, 12:10 PM
|
#25 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
1995 Honda Civic EX
0-60 in 8.4 seconds 1/4 16.5 seconds 1996 Honda Civic DX 0-60 in 8.5 seconds 1/4 16.7 seconds 1996 Honda Civic HX 0-60 in 9.4 seconds 1/4 17.1 seconds |
|
|
|
11-12-2002, 01:06 PM
|
#26 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Az
Age: 43
Posts: 3,804
|
How can a Dx and a Ex be so close when there's like a 20hp difference???
|
|
|
|
|
11-12-2002, 01:56 PM
|
#27 | |
|
Insomniac Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: OR
Age: 43
Posts: 11,142
|
Quote:
Weight.
__________________
1994 Accord EX coupe --Need hosting for your pics on HST? PM me...-- |
|
|
|
|
|
11-12-2002, 01:57 PM
|
#28 | |
|
Insomniac Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: OR
Age: 43
Posts: 11,142
|
Quote:
Where did you get those numbers?
__________________
1994 Accord EX coupe --Need hosting for your pics on HST? PM me...-- |
|
|
|
|
|
11-12-2002, 02:33 PM
|
#29 | |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
different places   But keep in mind you guys that better times are easily attainable...especially with the EX |
|
|
|
|
11-13-2002, 10:45 AM
|
#30 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
SO in three days we have gone from 12-14 seconds 0-60
to 8.5/9 seconds hmmm i wonder who is right and who is wrong? |
|
|
|
11-13-2002, 11:00 AM
|
#31 | ||
|
Zoom-Zoom
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,924
|
Quote:
2000 Civic EX Coupe Acceleration (0-60 mph): 8.5 sec. Base Engine Type: Inline 4 Horsepower: 127 hp Max Horsepower: 6600 rpm Torque: 107 ft-lbs. Max Torque: 5500 rpm Weight: 2513 lbs. ->SOURCE<- How's that? The 92-95 model has 2hp less.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
11-13-2002, 02:09 PM
|
#32 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Az
Age: 43
Posts: 3,804
|
Someone needs to get a damn Gtech and find out. Someone other than me.
|
|
|
|
|
11-13-2002, 02:17 PM
|
#33 | ||
|
Zoom-Zoom
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,924
|
Quote:
GTECH? Those things are notoriously inaccurate. Look at the link above. Much more reputable.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
11-13-2002, 02:19 PM
|
#34 | |
|
Insomniac Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: OR
Age: 43
Posts: 11,142
|
Quote:
They are consistant, but inaccurate, meaning that if you want to make a base run and see how your mods improve your times, etc. they are good. If you want an actual value, that isn't the best way to find it.
__________________
1994 Accord EX coupe --Need hosting for your pics on HST? PM me...-- |
|
|
|
|
|
11-14-2002, 04:21 AM
|
#35 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Az
Age: 43
Posts: 3,804
|
Those fools(at Gtech) are lying then? Well damn, never mind.
|
|
|
|
|
11-18-2002, 03:04 PM
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: ECUSA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,693
|
where in gods name did you here gtech's where inaccurate????
whoever told you that is wrong. road and track tested them vs. a real dyno and got less than the advertised +/- 3hp everytime. the only thing that makes them inaccurate are there limited load ranges. A hard launch or slight change in angle of the hill/road your on can affect the numbers. they are perfectly accurate and consistant. the only inaccuracy is in user error.
__________________
I am an A$$hole... take anything I say to heart at YOUR OWN RISK... |
|
|
|
|
11-18-2002, 03:25 PM
|
#37 | ||
|
Zoom-Zoom
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,924
|
Quote:
The inaccuracy is in normal roads. We don't all have the perfect flat straightaways.....
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
11-18-2002, 06:27 PM
|
#38 | |
|
Insomniac Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: OR
Age: 43
Posts: 11,142
|
Quote:
Exactly, I should have mentioned it.
__________________
1994 Accord EX coupe --Need hosting for your pics on HST? PM me...-- |
|
|
|
|
|
11-19-2002, 07:12 AM
|
#39 | |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
7 seconds from 0-60 mhp on a stock engine???? It cant be true.. |
|
|
|
|
11-20-2002, 12:46 PM
|
#40 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: ECUSA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,693
|
Quote:
then there is NO inaccuracy in the unit. it's driver/conditional error that screws things up. you shouldn't go around bashing the most revolutionary product released in 20 years cuz you can't find a straight road. I'm not trying to be a dick it's just that Noob's could read that and be like oh im not getting one of those. then the good people at g-tech loose money cuz you mis-informed somebody. |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
