.:HSTuners::

slowEJ6 · 12-29-2001, 02:11 AM

well lets see......if it was a plain ol "hi i paid too much for this stupid non sc s281" mustang then hes running more or less 14.2 (about the same as a GT)
the sc'ed version (which btw is MUCH quieter than the S351, the SC is not nearly as audible) runs a mere 13.8 in the 1/4. yes thats right. its not fast. and yes it does suffer from a lack of traction, but you'll see even car and driver didnt break 13.8, however Ford states it can hit 13.4. however still not very fast. however the fact that the S281 has 350hp is evident (oh and btw im talking about a 2000 S281 here) at higher speeds. The S281 reaches 100 mph 2.1 seconds quicker than the GT. And the dash to 130 mph is a full 13.5 seconds quicker.
so yes, its very capable he raced an SC S281.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

12-29-2001, 02:11 AM	#12
slowEJ6 Registered User Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Oviedo, FL Age: 43 Posts: 3,195	well lets see......if it was a plain ol "hi i paid too much for this stupid non sc s281" mustang then hes running more or less 14.2 (about the same as a GT) the sc'ed version (which btw is MUCH quieter than the S351, the SC is not nearly as audible) runs a mere 13.8 in the 1/4. yes thats right. its not fast. and yes it does suffer from a lack of traction, but you'll see even car and driver didnt break 13.8, however Ford states it can hit 13.4. however still not very fast. however the fact that the S281 has 350hp is evident (oh and btw im talking about a 2000 S281 here) at higher speeds. The S281 reaches 100 mph 2.1 seconds quicker than the GT. And the dash to 130 mph is a full 13.5 seconds quicker. so yes, its very capable he raced an SC S281.