.:HSTuners::::Hondas Wanted:: |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Age: 39
Posts: 5,446
|
low-end torque
I'm just a bit curious, what would you any of you suggest for upping the low end torque in a 96 accord VTEC?
how about high-end torque? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Posts: n/a
|
A V6.
![]() I have an '01 I4 and I'd looooove more torque. b |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2nd Gear
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Age: 45
Posts: 211
|
get a header and then maybe exhaust if you don't already
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Age: 39
Posts: 5,446
|
ok so all i need are headers then heh
and an intermediate pipe, just got my axle-back exhaust two days ago |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Insomniac Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: OR
Age: 44
Posts: 11,142
|
Quote:
A header isn't going to boost your low end much, if at all. Pulleys will give you a couple of hp down low, but all in all, there isn't a lot you can do without a lot of money.
__________________
1994 Accord EX coupe --Need hosting for your pics on HST? PM me...-- |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
2nd Gear
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Age: 45
Posts: 211
|
After having my header installed I noticed lots of low-end torque 94accordex do you have a header??
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Insomniac Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: OR
Age: 44
Posts: 11,142
|
Quote:
Yeah, a DC ceramic 4-2-1. My butt dyno didn't really pick up much on this one, but then again, I'm running the stock exhaust. I think of low end around 2k, and I don't think that the gains are there with this header.
__________________
1994 Accord EX coupe --Need hosting for your pics on HST? PM me...-- |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
2nd Gear
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Age: 45
Posts: 211
|
I got my exhaust and header at the same time so I guess that's why I noticed such a big gain. But you would notice it alot more if you got the whole I/H/E I have a chikara tork-step 4-2-1
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Insomniac Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: OR
Age: 44
Posts: 11,142
|
Quote:
Yeah, but a free-flow exhaust generally shifts the torque curve higher in the RPM band. I'm not saying you didn't notice gains, but they aren't too big.
__________________
1994 Accord EX coupe --Need hosting for your pics on HST? PM me...-- |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Age: 39
Posts: 5,446
|
do pulleys make much of a difference, I was looking at them on styledright, but I'm just wondering if they are worth it
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Insomniac Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: OR
Age: 44
Posts: 11,142
|
Quote:
I have an AEM set. They're ok, but I'd do I/H/E first. Better gains for the money.
__________________
1994 Accord EX coupe --Need hosting for your pics on HST? PM me...-- |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
2nd Gear
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Age: 45
Posts: 211
|
Quote:
Also, Honda Non-Vtecs are known for having a little more low end torque. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Repost Wagon
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: over here
Age: 44
Posts: 17,266
|
heh, max torque in our accords around 3500rpms. now that seems kinda in the low range doesn't it ?
__________________
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Posts: n/a
|
For a "torquey" engine, 3500 is about right for peak torque.
For a high-revving HP motor, 3500 is a little low in the band for peak. My car suffers both from lack of peak torque and not enough torque under the curve. b |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Age: 39
Posts: 5,446
|
my car has decent high-end torque (specially when downshifting is used) it's just that off the line bs that usually kills me, man what I would do for DOHC, and man if only I had the cash
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Posts: n/a
|
Get Level-10 Torque Converter...if you have auto tranny.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Age: 39
Posts: 5,446
|
definatly have a manual, I refuse to touch a auto
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Posts: n/a
|
i hate auto's.....never will purchase a car with one.....
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Posts: n/a
|
i heard that the level 10 torque converter will burn manual all day.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Repost Wagon
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: over here
Age: 44
Posts: 17,266
|
yeah i heard the same thing too. wait till i get the moola and i am going to have one installed in my automagic.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Posts: n/a
|
same here..i think it cost around 300-400 bucks...price of a cat-back...hmm..what should i get first?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Can it really, though? Auto tranny weighs more and is less efficient mechanically regardless of how efficient the torque converter is. So then the only real difference I see that could make a difference would be the gear ratios and the drivers. Or am I totally missing something? b |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Repost Wagon
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: over here
Age: 44
Posts: 17,266
|
yeah the price fell from around 900 to 500 now. i am most likely to get one in the spring.
and spooge: most of the tranny losses on an automagic come from the torque converter.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Age: 39
Posts: 5,446
|
hey just wait till I get the cash for a H22 and turbo, I'll teach your torque converter a lesson or two, as if I could ever raise the money
![]() Accord engines can have a turbo slapped on it right? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Posts: n/a
|
Shard: Yes, you could slap a turbo on Accords engine...cost around 3-4G for a level 1 turbo.
Hondaman: Where will you get your Level 10 torque converter from? Order from Level 10 itself or another place? |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Posts: n/a
|
Stefan: Ok.
While we're on the subjects of turbos, anybody know a decent bolt-on supercharger or turbo kit for the 6th gen I4's? b |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Repost Wagon
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: over here
Age: 44
Posts: 17,266
|
i know fmax has one, and max rev does make one for the f series engines. i think i can get you the maxrev pretty cheap if you want.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Posts: n/a
|
Turbo or supercharger?
I'd rather put on a supercharger than a turbo, I'd have to think more about putting on a turbo. I'd have to think a decent amount about any FI setup, though......depends on how much has to be done and what it all costs I guess. b |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Age: 39
Posts: 5,446
|
as far as turbo's and superchargers go I'm alittle under unedumicated
![]() what can a supercharger off more than a turbo? basically I'm asking pro's and con's for the SC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Posts: n/a
|
A supercharger has a much more linear power increase than a turbo since they are mechanically driven rather than through exhaust gases. Due to the exhaust gases and heats a turbo deals with, they are considered less reliable or of a shorter lifespan than a blower. Also due to the way the blower is driven, they do not suffer from turbo lag.
Personally I consider a blower to be a more useful component for daily drivers where you're only looking for a modest power boost. If you want drastic power bumps, though, you'll need a turbo. I'm not aware of any superchargers that really boost power drastically. b |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Age: 39
Posts: 5,446
|
so what exactly would the power boost be if, say if i were to get a SC way down the road? what kind of gains would you estimate?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|