Quote:
Originally posted by highlander
No; hence the quotes. But it is easier to "ignore" the millions of starving children because there has always been millions of starving children; it isn't a new problem... it is an old problem that we help with some, but realize WE CAN NOT feed millions of children; it is simply impossible. We CAN, however, help with the new problem, the tsunami.
|
We realize that we can't help the millions of children..so we don't exphasize in it..because we KNOW it just won't happen. Right?
What makes people think they can help EVERYONE in the tsunami disaster? They can't. So, what's the difference in that theory of yours?