View Single Post
Old 05-18-2004, 11:52 PM   #70
nonovurbizniz
Registered User
 
nonovurbizniz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: ECUSA
Age: 47
Posts: 2,693
20 people isn't mass destruction...

A weapong of MASS destruction would indicate there would be "massive" damage...

No mortor or barrel of old mustard gas with a grenade on it is going to cause MASS damage.

If it were such a victory for his B.S. story about WMD he'd be shouting it from the roof top with his arrogant snide half cocked smile in full blast... he's not because it's not.

I mean for christ sake at this point I think HE'D be suprised if we even found EVIDENCE of a WMD program... much less a stockpile or nuclear material like he implied.

Colin Powell was reported to have said "I'm not going to read this CRAP!" about what he was handed to read to the U.N....

If that doesn't say they knew it was B.S. from the begining then how about the fact that it was ALL so PERFECTLY worded so as he wouldn't be held responsible for lying...

british intelligence tells us that Iraq meant to obtain Uranium from Niger...

REALLY???? and exactly what did OUR intelligence have to say about this report... OHHHH that it was INCORRECT AND TOTALLY UNFOUNDED... but it's still worth mentioning to the nation... RIGHHHT.

Aluminum tubes... I've got frigging aluminum tubes... Even then when they got pressed on the details as to HOW that was incriminating evidence they stated that they were CLOSE to the size they would need to be to be used as part of a centerfuge...

I said right when he spouted all that crap... Just say your daddy F'd up and you're going to fix it... I'd follow that...

not some 2 faced, lying monkey, son of a pussy who couldn't finish the job to begin with... Don't want any bad P.R. going into an election.

If they find ANY CLEAR evidence of WMD in Iraq that were GOV. SANCTIONED... I will admit I'm wrong till I'm blue in the face...

But why would bush WANT that... why not just say, there may or may not be WMD... with or without this guy is a threat to stability of not only his own nation but the world...

NO ONE could argue with that... but making up reasons and trying to make links that aren't there... and even IF they were... are CERTAINLY not HALF as bad as they are in other places...

Iran HAS Nuclear power... Pakistan HAS NUKES... N Korea and China are run by people JUST as nuts as Saddam if not more so...

If the U.S. had stopped with Afghanastan and pressed other SERIOUSLY threatening nations we'd be in a LOT better standing right now...

Also if we started taking the Palistinian's problems into account a LOT more seriously and put SERIOUS pressure on Isreal to grow the F up then we'd be in IMPECABLE standing with not just most nations but TONS of muslim nations that are either riding the fence or just hate us... don't wish us dead... but hate us.

We need to stop being such loud mouth hypocrites... You can't say that it's important to you to "deliver freedom" to the Iraqi people when you won't even acknowledge a TRUELY oppressed Country like Palistine is being Ass raped by a Gov which we ACTIVELY AND HEAVILY support... Who's going to believe you...

If you're going to be a loud arrogant american... at least be honest about it.
__________________
I am an A$$hole... take anything I say to heart at YOUR OWN RISK...
nonovurbizniz is offline   Reply With Quote