View Single Post
Old 05-04-2004, 08:51 PM   #8
CD5Passion
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Age: 39
Posts: 5,446
never heard of a Mercury camera therefore would say it may be a waste of money, 3.1 isnt too bad but it isn't high quality. I say you save alittle money and buy a nice sony camera, those are real nice and the upper model will record motion along with still shots. right now those are around the best on the market. I'm picky aswell
__________________
CD5Passion is offline   Reply With Quote