oh wow, i have hours of fun to play with the past posts.... here i go..
Quote:
Originally posted by cashizslick
If you think like this, you have no business leeching off of the freedoms and wrights you have as an american citizen
If you think dropping an atomic weapon on japan was a bad idea, you are an IDIOT. Would you rather the US army have lead a grownd war against japan? This would have caused many more AMERICAN casualties - if you think this way, you should consider moving.
How as an American citizen can you tell me that attacking Iraq, a nation hostile to the US who has been involved in shaddy A** business for over a century, is a wrong or unjust thing to do.
Sure the US has made mistakes - we admit it and have changed as a country and a nation - Name one other nation where and Ethnic group or other powerless social minority has the ability to change a nation through peacefull non-cooperation?
Saddam is an EVIL person who should not be allowed to continue wasting fresh air.
If EVERY country has SKELETONS in its closet, why are you even arguing with me in the first place? Why should world events even consern a passivist such as yourself?
This really disturbs me:
We are a country of free speach, free elections, equal rights, a country built on freedom.
Iraq does not have free anything - Saddam forces more than just views down the throats of his people [Devistating Chemical Weapons].
How as a human being can you watch others suffer and not feel a sence of their pain - what is wrong with you?
If u were and Iraqi, you'd be Damn glad Saddam is about to be kicked out of office - or maybe not, your views are quite strange - you might like getting oppressed by a dictator or communist govt.
i mean, those govts do not do things in secret, they dont act in a secretive manner, their evil deeds are obvious.
|
once again you FAILED to show saddam is a threat to US soil. you cannot go to war on a hunch. if you think that some poeple might be attacked because of weapons some dictator MIGHT have.... that is VERY weak. we will kill iraqi civiliansin this war, there will be casualties of war that are very unnessisary, over something that is non of the US's business yet. once saddam attacks a mid-east country in an inhumane way or shows to be a threat to a contry that cannot defend its self, then the UN would set in to put the foot down.
im glad you are SO self centered that the death of 350000 japanise civilans was accepatble instead of attacking the japanise army. if would be just like if saddam desided that instead of attacking our army and risk loosing iraqi's that he just nuke newyork and LA. it would save his peoples lives, and kill less americans, but you know what, its ****ING WRONG.
The laws of america are not the laws of the world. you say you want freedom, but everytime someone disagrees with you, you tell them to go live in iraq with our dictator we love, well, that sure as hell doesnt sound like someone who believes in freedom to me. you are SUCH a hypocrate. you say one thing, but contradict it. you want to go to war to save innocent american lives at the cost of US diplomacy with the world, and the loss of US troops and civilians around the world. this has so much more potential of springing terrorist attacks by rouge groups of iraqi's because of the horsesh!t that bush is pushing.
you want to talk about a country that REALLY ****ed its people over.. WE DID. ever herd of the american indians? they were living peacfully here then europeans came and enslaved them. our government had military missions to kill native americans just because we wanted their land. that was genocide to our people. they showed no threat other than fear we put into them because of attacking them. we can look at colenel mustard and his campains chasing indans all over america, or the trail of tears where president jackson moved all the cherokee indians form their homes to a spot of land far away. today even we have our indian concentraion camps(or reserves, however you want to look at them) where we gave them a very small portion of land for them to live on.
thats very old though, how about something more recent... like segragation of blacks. they were put in different schools, treated like crap, beaten, denyed basic human needs, killed for someone elses crime, touchered, told they were less human than whites and this was just 40 years ago. we are the most advanced country in the world, and that is through experience. you cannot tell a kid that something is hot and expect him to believe you without testing it. when we were developing our country through the past few 100 years, europeans didnt have the same beliefes as us, but you know what, it was our country, not theirs they knew their place and only stepped in when it involved endagerment to their colonies or poeple in "the new world"
i am not a supporter of saddam, and i do not agree with what he does. but it is not my business. george washington said that foriegn affairs would be the downfall of this nation. lets not prove him right. nothing will kill world support with the USA more than if we were wrong in this matter. how is it going to look if we once again murder civilans because of what we THOUGHT was best for the world. i bet the american indians or african americans understand that a different culture isnt a lower one that deserves to die.
how about next time you preach for peace and unity in the world, you not do it by going to war when there are alternative methods of dealing with issues