View Single Post
Old 03-20-2003, 03:39 PM   #57
ShEaNy
Registered User
 
ShEaNy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Age: 40
Posts: 3,821
Quote:
Originally posted by ChrisCantSkate
please, tell me, im playing dumb so you explane this, how has saddam threatend us? and dont say by supporting osama bin laden because both of those men would be no where without the US support. he has no way of getting missles out of the country to bomb us, he is NOT a terrorist, he is DICTATOR. if he were to attack right now why in the hell would he worry about bombing a building when he has the american and birtish armed forces raiding his country.

north korea is ALOT different than this. we know north korea has a nuke program, and since they are under Chinas umbrella i see bush telling china to get nukes out of n. korea or we will arm s. korea. you do not bomb a country with nukes when it has the 3rd largest military in the world, and has the country with the largest population backing it. that is called DUMBASS. he cant have diplomatic relations with sadaam because when missles were found that exceeded the distance, they were destroiyed, then when nothing else could be found, bush told him to get out or go to war. that sounds QUITE imperialistic to me. then... to make things better bush said that when saddam is out, he will let iraqi citizens set up thier own government... as long as it didnt conflict with americas plans in the middle east and was a democracy.

and while we think what goes on over there inhumane and immoral, remeber that it is a ENTIRELY different culture. i has indian friends(india) who think americans are crazy for eating cows, but you know what, thats our culture. everyone is not an america, and for you to be one, you need to accept people for who they are.

i hate having a new thread like this every week when the same old topics are brought up. unless you can PROVE to me WITHOUT A CHADOW OF A DOUBT(that is OUR way of desiding justice after all) that saddam has weapons that bush claims he does, and he has the intent on using it on US soil, then i fail to see the need for war. nothing will look worse than saddam being out of power or dead, and then having the entire country ripped apart to find nothing. i am not anti-war or pro-war under all circumstances, i think war is the last alternative to diplomacy. we are not out of options yet, well i should say we wernt. now we have no option but war, unless saddam does something


well put....
ShEaNy is offline   Reply With Quote