Thread: Cougar VS Si
View Single Post
Old 02-11-2003, 01:10 PM   #28
ford50forlife
4th Gear
 
ford50forlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CONNETICUT WOOT!
Age: 41
Posts: 619
Quote:
Originally posted by T_Si

Since there's no such thing as a 1998 Si, I would probably guess that you raced a lowly Sohc EX or Dx, with maybe a Air filter and a big muffler. So don't get so hyped up over small fry, the big one got away.


??? big one got away? sorry i just have to laugh at that, why do you rank on cougars if they make more hp stock and have more potential than a all motor si? dont start on that 100hp / liter thing either, cause stock to stock there is hp to be had left in the 2.5l as oppossed to the 1.6l, motor to motor, its just a better starting point (at least hp wise lol the weight thing kinda screws it up :o ). its just a matter of not building a motor 90% to its full potential and putting on the market like hondas always do, thats all (i.e. si, new nsx, rsx, type-r) none the less its very impressive to say the least though, but i rarely see any all motor si's running some serious numbers, yet agian i dont see ANY COUGARS running it but i just had to comment on a blanket statement lol
__________________

2640lbs with full tank minus me w/ 302cid
check out the crustang and 88 cherokee @
www.cardomain.com/id/ford50forlife

Last edited by ford50forlife : 02-11-2003 at 01:17 PM.
ford50forlife is offline   Reply With Quote