16's on a 91?
Ok i was going to get 18's but my fiend has a gen 5 (94) hatch and 17's rub on hers with a 2" drop so i figure 18's are def. out of the question, i really don't want any rubbing. I am eventually gettin either a full coilover system (drop around 2-2 1/2") or a 2" drop with springs and i wanna know what 16's look like to be safe. Anyone got pics of a 91 with 16's or 17's. If 17's don't rub i'll go with 17's, anyone? Thanks
-Deze- |
On an older civic like that 16's will do you fine.. Just pay attention to the backspacing. You could probably get 17 or even 18 under it with the right backspacing, But then you have a very heavy wheel slowing you down. 16's are perfect on the 4th Gen Civics.
|
That's what i was figuring. I was goin to get 18's then get 16's for the front for the track, but i thought about it and realized 16's would be aight by themselves and it would save me $ not getting the extra wheels. Just wanna see how they look. Thanks man
-Deze- |
anytime man..
I personally thing 18's are just way to big for the 4th Gen civics, I think they look alittle funny because they look out of place.. |
i got 17s for my 90 sedan ill find out if they rub in the spring
|
16's are a good size to run with.....Indeed w/ the rigt backspacing 17/18's are possible but for the weight addition you are probably better w/ the 16 as you will also do better on gas..
hope this helps alittle....::yes:: |
I have a 91 civic with 16's and a 3" drop. i think it looks perfect. ill post up some pics in a day or so, when i can get my dads digital camera.
|
Quote:
18's are way too big on any civic..... Man they look like you're four-wheeling.... But do whatcha like.... I'm with the 16s.... |
Quote:
They dont look bad on SI's... I wouldnt do it.. They just dont look bad.. |
anything above 16" rims is too big. *cough*TOM
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 HSTuners.com