What the hell? You just babling dumb shit. Where did i say bolt ons are efficent? As a matter of fact if you had any kind of common sense at all you could have searched the site and seen i reccomend against bolts and for a turbo you stupid prick.
And bolt on to a 4 cyclinder is a wast of money, period.

No, you can't. A civic will never hang with an 03 cobra stock for stock, of a neon srt-4, or an wrx, or an evo...jesus your stupid.

And even though i clarfied before (which obviosuly wasn't enough) I never said win.

Now stop being a little *****.

well according to you captain Rice, a second difference or so is called hanging. or maybe i missread again? just agree that you are a ricer and be on with it come on.

once again your own words. bolt on wont nock off .5 secs or even .3.

LOL, in case you haven't got it. Calling me a ricer doesn't bother me.

Again, you just making shit up. I never said a second, you did. I said less then half a second.

Im sure a civic ex with full bolts very little gas, and weight cut here and there WILL run low 15s.

you said bolt ons on a 4 cyl are a waste of time, why then are you talking about it?

They are. To me dumping over 1.5k of money into bolt ons only to gain a second or so is a stupid waste compared to spend 2.5-3k on a turbo setup.

Am i wrong?

no. although you wont gain "a second or so" wit bolt on. imho only bolt ons worthy getting with your turbo setup is clutch/lighter flywheel setup. but thats about it. i would also focus on suspension first before putting a big turbo on the car.

I agree. with the turbo setup.

But disagree with full bolts on. I am more than willing to bet you will gain a second.

Lol...this reminds me of some street racing thing I saw on TV where some guy had dumped (his own estimation) close to $30K into an N/A RHD Civic, I believe it was. He was so proud it would run 14s. Then when he went to race it, it broke down. Apparently the 240hp he claimed was just too much for the car to handle. Hehe.

jeez that guy was a moron. with 30k in my 240 i will be pushing close to 800. idle will be kinda rough tho.

$30K? I've got just a little over $10K in my car (that includes transmission and suspension) and I'm sitting on 657 block-cracking hp. With $30K I could be looking at well over 1000hp.

LOL. It must have been too much power!!!

LISTEN 240 SX, Your car will get smoked from civic ex its even though its got less horse power. Its not 110 its 130 stock vtec and the engine is just more refiend than that of a 240 sx.

Just go drift somehwhere:toofunny: :nana: :nono:

And there is no way a stock civic beat a svt mustang impossible.

Not even possible in your dreams drdingo21 :nono: :nono: :nono:

Good thing i don't drive a stock civic then, isn't it? Idiot

OOOOPS
 

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh:o :o :o

What kind of modification do you have?

i don't have the civic at all. This whole post was about my new car. Even my second post was a link to pics of my car:)

you are an idiot, and i proved it so many times. your stock civic is worthless and your vtec is worthless. theres no way in hell stock civics every beat me. not stock.

and im more into autoX btw.

why dont you learn before making an idiot out of yourself, although you provided a good laugh for other people:no:

Im sensing some car-race bashing here (as in "nissans/hondas/fords/chevy/etc suck")...thats immature

ok, but wheres the common sence? stock civic ex isnt worth shit. its a fact. slapped with a t25 or t28 = way to go. enough of bs.

I actually wasnt refering to you...but alright.
Are you saying that turbo ex's are still junk??

A civic ex is about as fast as a stock 240...

You are here------
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------>Topic is here


Seriously...how did this get so far away from the intended topic onto 240SXs vs. Civics? Personally...I don't care who'd win. Bench racing sucks.

im not bench racing, neither do i give a fuck about drag. im just stating the fact. i dynoed at 165rwhp, dont even tell me what your fucking civic will be at, crank is always higher.

(ok I wont
"178whp civic ex w/ edelbrock kit @ 7psi"
"185whp civic ex w/ greddy kit @ 8psi"
oops...sorry)

we are talking stock. READ THE FUCKING THREAD.

why dont you calm down and clean up your mouth

^im with him, on this


i want to race 240sxhoe, i get my car in 3 days, it is a 96 accord lx, I/h/e, (which i have to give back to the guy after i by mine from honda man) is running @ 145hp before everyting, plus 5-10hp for i, and 5-10hp for h, and 5-10 hp for e, just so you get the jist of it, my car was dynoed @ 165.4 horse power with minor bolt ons, so i think i can beat your 240 with your "75 shot" (coughbscough)



just venting, so hey pdigg, hows the hunt for more jdm stuff?

eh Im probably about done for now...money ya know? 1 thing Id like to get my hands on are a set of bumpers (w/ the trim). But since I probably wont get those just the thin moldings and installing sidemarkers are probably it...then its onto LS+Turbo building/buying

thats cool

your a loser drdingo! U make us realy performance enthusiasts look bad. No wonder all the american car lovers call us all ricers! Please give me a break. SVT mustang versus your little Accord? OMFG what a freakin joke!!! Go somewhere else where everyone will believe your little story. The guy in the Munstang was prolly laughing at u when u were celebrating and throwing your hands cuz u thought u were a billy bad a$$ (cuz he wasnt even trying).

Your afucking moron. Why am I an idiot? In case you ddin't read the thread (which you obviosuly didn't) That year SVT is equal in performance to my car. Now stop being a doche bag and draggin up threads that old.

Read the thread before you post anymore stupid shit. Fag

Who is the fag now? how can you even compare your accord to SVT? SVT is NOT GT.

YOU are the idiot.
your village just called btw looking for you.

MY god. Your stupidty simply amazes me. Do some god dam research. The are almost identical in how they perform. Actually look back through this thread i post upteen stats about both cars from a slew of resources. And they are all almost the same.

There were always be stupid fucks like you two that will take facts and twist them to their own point of view. It is simply amazing.

Lets go back over this. The accord is a low 14 second car. The SVT mustang is a low 14 second car.... Now for the slow idiots (just you two) That means they will perform the same. Amazing huh?

Now stop being a little bitch and just posting shit that you think is correct, you have proven time and time again you have no common sense.

And what are you talking about a GT for? Are you that dumb?


Your right. I forgot about you, you are also a fag.

wow, I just read this whole thing. Its like watching an episode of elimidate:rolleyes:

ive read throught this whole thread and i have to say that while if the drivers were equal the svt would definatly win it is a litle faster and defiantly has better top end than an accord. But you have to understand that a svt mustang has a realy touchy clutch one of my dads work buddys just got a 2003 ( ya i know the moddel years are differnt but he test drove an older one and said it was just as touchy) svt cobra and he ground the gears every time he tried to power shift for the first few months the guy might not have been that good of driver. I admit it soes sound a little fishy but the profarmce speck are the same seems like in a 1/4 mile or shorter race the better driver would win

Im not saying I totaly dusted the svt. And im sure the reason i got such a jump was because i was still in scond gear. Not to mention i don't know if it was a stick or an automatic. And i am more than confident that any race with those year SVTs would be a drivers race. Both cars almost excatly matched.
But there are dumbshits (like the two above) that don't understand that.

Its nice to see someone that actually puts a little thought and applies some common sense to their posts.

SVT cobra is supercharged V8 rating at 375rwhp. even with a auto, you will piss your panties.

how can your accord beat that?

please. and who is the fag.

your more than welcome to come over to my gym and tell me i'm a fag in my face. come on, you want to.



your all big over the wire.:doh: :bomb:

LMAO! Holy shit! The whole time you argued with me was because your a god dam moron! LMAO

please son don't threaten me over the intenet. You probly a buck sixty soping wet.
But If you feel the need to come here and prove your self id be more then happy to level your ass. About a year and half ago i was 215lbs and ranked 4th state wide in my boxing league.

Go back and read the the thread to see why you such a stupid fuck.

lol What a waste of my time




And your still a fag, now just a dumb fag

I feel so unprepared...I didn't puff up my chest or anything.

Here's the deal. I do believe you're BOTH acting like dicks. 240SX...he didn't say he raced an '03 Cobra. An '03 Cobra will give a Z06 a run for it's money stock vs. stock. And Dingo...I'm not sure who drove those cars in the tests you posted, but I've never seen a compitent driver hit anything higher than a high 13. Notice I said compitent...not good. A good one will have it in the mid 13s on factory tires. Like I said, magazines like C&D and R&T tests are JOKES compared to real world drivers. Hell...when the '00 Cobra Rs came out enthusiast mags were burning damn near a half second off of their counterpart's times (hell, I pulled off a 13.89 @ 106 in a '98 Cobra and I'm really not good at driving a stick). Like I said, I'm not calling BS...it's just what I've seen and what I know. The guy could've just been a terrible driver.

Look at all of this...you guys spout out specs like you know your shit but you don't even know an SVT Cobra has NEVER, I repeat NEVER come with a factory automatic transmission. It's just not an option. Now all of this bullshit about who's bigger than who...wtf is that shit? That's like that one douche bag wanting to race me from halfway across the country. I'm sure you feel all big and bad being keyboard bullies but just knock it the fuck off. It's fucking childish. I think you both know you're better than this.