bush is a goof

[mt.biker]

http://www.tjelvar.org/~bjoern/isolation/thismanisabouttostartawar.JPG

[Spazum888]

http://www.snopes.com/photos/graphics/binoc1.jpg

they both cant use them.

[a96710]

LOL...what morons

[RU_Teg]

what a bunch of idiots...lmao...forgot to take off the cover...lol:crazy:

[94_AcCoRd_EX]

:rolleyes:

[ShEaNy]

repost? lol still funny

[firstgeardude]

ahahahah thats good... i wonder how long it took him to realize that the cover was on?

[RU_Teg]

^ I dont kno man...lol...probably a while...this isn't too cool, we have a President that can't even figure out that he didnt take of the cover...lol...doesn't look like he's too bright..lol;)

[juvenile]

Dudes, I think this is getting a bit out of hand!
I dont' think biker wanted a Bush bashing thread. Just some silly joke! (that's why he said goof not dumbass or something bad)
goof means in a light sense that he's acting funny...or so Ithink.

[RU_Teg]

ah...I see where ur coming from...mah bad guys, didn't mean to insult bush too badly...:pfft:

[armyguy5]

those arent just Binos...there something else...can't tell u though

chris

[Wren57]

I'd just like to point something out guys... this picture is obviously photchopped... check out the light directly under Bush's eyes... this light is coming from the binoculars... and had the lense caps been on, there would be no light coming from them. This is evidence that this picture has been butchered by someone who has way too much time on their hands who thinks they can run the country better than George Walker Bush can. And to anyone who reads this... including myself... he is doing a much better job than you or I could do:yes:

[94_AcCoRd_EX]

Originally posted by highlander
And to anyone who reads this... including myself... he is doing a much better job than you or I could do:yes:

Thank you.


Threads making fun of our President aren't cool IMO. :no:

[mt.biker]

how could it be "photochopped" if it was scanned out of a mag?

I'll leave that with you for a bit!

[spoogenet]

Originally posted by mt.biker
how could it be "photochopped" if it was scanned out of a mag?

I'll leave that with you for a bit!

Easy, it could have been photochopped before being printed in the mag. If you believe in your first question, then surely you'd also believe every picture ever printed in the National Enquirer, among others.

However I'm not so positive this picture is photochopped. If they have optical properties like real binoculars (assuming armyguy is right, which he probably is if he's in the Army), then the light should be shining on his eyeballs rather than below them. If all the light is coming out below his eyeballs then what in the world is he looking at? One can see from the binocular position that they are lined up with his eyeballs. The light beneath his eyes could be the normal light that would show up, it looks broken because of the shadow of the binocs.

Unless there's some other secret aperture to these things, then I think the picture is genuine.

b

[ebpda9]

Originally posted by highlander
I'd just like to point something out guys... this picture is obviously photchopped... check out the light directly under Bush's eyes... this light is coming from the binoculars... and had the lense caps been on, there would be no light coming from them. This is evidence that this picture has been butchered by someone who has way too much time on their hands who thinks they can run the country better than George Walker Bush can. And to anyone who reads this... including myself... he is doing a much better job than you or I could do:yes:

maybe the binos are so hi-tech that you don't need to remove the lens caps :crazy: ;)