PDA

View Full Version : wouldnt this be true

FLAT_LINER
05-09-2002, 03:07 PM
ok i was looking at a website dont remember which one and they said that the 97-98 type r did not have a/c well if thats true then it would be faster than the 2000 type r or is the website wrong


thnx
TruHeel142
05-09-2002, 07:58 PM
Originally posted by FLAT_LINER
ok i was looking at a website dont remember which one and they said that the 97-98 type r did not have a/c well if thats true then it would be faster than the 2000 type r or is the website wrong


thnx

I wasn't aware that ANY type r's have ever had a/c.....definetely the 97-98's didn't, but I didn't think the 00's had it either.
blownteggy
05-10-2002, 12:54 AM
true the 97-98 did not have a/c...the 00's however do have a/c the still lay the same hp numbers though
Badcar22
05-10-2002, 08:32 AM
more than i know i thought they all had ac
TruHeel142
05-10-2002, 01:11 PM
Originally posted by blownteggy
true the 97-98 did not have a/c...the 00's however do have a/c the still lay the same hp numbers though

thanks 4 clearing that up.....and where did u get ur signature picture??? thats hillarious!!!!
blownteggy
05-10-2002, 02:33 PM
Originally posted by TruHeel142


thanks 4 clearing that up.....and where did u get ur signature picture??? thats hillarious!!!!
got it from here (http://www.rockim.com/priceless4.php)
FLAT_LINER
05-10-2002, 03:11 PM
Originally posted by blownteggy
true the 97-98 did not have a/c...the 00's however do have a/c the still lay the same hp numbers though



well so the 97-98 would be faster right?
2ndGenTeg
05-12-2002, 01:30 AM
The reason they have the same hp numbers is that manufacturers rate hp at the flywheel rather than the wheels, before any parasitic drag. However, the 97-98, lacking a/c, would put down more power to the wheels.