PDA

View Full Version : War Of The Worlds *spoilers inside*


AkimboStylee
07-01-2005, 04:55 AM
This is a must see movie, You all Need to see this movie. Speilberg didn't fluff it up at all, tom cruise acted extremely well, so did dakota fanning. 2 1/2 hours of non-stop extreme action.

GT40FIED
07-01-2005, 05:23 AM
I think I'll skip it and watch the original. Dakota Fanning is a phenominal actress for her age, but Tom Curise is just such a complete douche bag. All of his bullshit publicity stunts as of late make me want to avoid this movie purely out of spite.

AkimboStylee
07-01-2005, 06:47 AM
dont miss this movie, it is bad ass. believe me, and go and see this movie!!!!

pdiggitydogg
07-01-2005, 10:22 AM
I heard all the characters were 1 dimensional and the whole thing was just lacking. I might see it anyway, today...

GT40FIED
07-01-2005, 11:14 AM
Originally posted by pdiggitydogg
I heard all the characters were 1 dimensional and the whole thing was just lacking.

That...and there's no way in hell I'm giving money to a member (Cruise) of a cult (scientology).

Leets
07-01-2005, 12:10 PM
Originally posted by GT40FIED
All of his bullshit publicity stunts as of late make me want to avoid this movie purely out of spite.

If I avoided movies just because they used publicity stunts to promote it then I'd never get to see a movie... outside of the occasional indie film... which isn't necessarily a bad thing. It's just that occasionally I like to shut down my brain for a couple hours out of the month, give it a break from constantly trying to figure out why other people are such morons, and just see lots of big explosions and car chases.:yes: ;)

Besides, I really don't think it's fair to blame the celebrities for all the publicity stunts. Afterall, if the general public honestly didn't care then there would be no reason for them. So next time you're in the grocery store make sure to give a big "F*ck U" to the overweight housewife buried in an issue of PEOPLE.

GT40FIED
07-01-2005, 12:29 PM
Originally posted by Leets
If I avoided movies just because they used publicity stunts to promote it then I'd never get to see a movie... outside of the occasional indie film... which isn't necessarily a bad thing. It's just that occasionally I like to shut down my brain for a couple hours out of the month, give it a break from constantly trying to figure out why other people are such morons, and just see lots of big explosions and car chases.:yes: ;)

Besides, I really don't think it's fair to blame the celebrities for all the publicity stunts. Afterall, if the general public honestly didn't care then there would be no reason for them. So next time you're in the grocery store make sure to give a big "F*ck U" to the overweight housewife buried in an issue of PEOPLE.

Normally publicity stunts are just publicity stunts. I've gotten used to them. But getting engaged and jumping around on Oprah's furniture and arguing with that Today Show guy (who just sat back and let Cruise make an ass of himself) to promote your movie is a bit much.

Fatal070
07-01-2005, 12:31 PM
it was just ok... nothing better.. 7/10 if that... I don't know but this movie was just retarted... and the ending was so stupid...

****SPOILER*** BELOW....









































AND HOW THE FUCK DID THAT BOY NOT DIE!

Racing Rice
07-01-2005, 01:14 PM
Originally posted by GT40FIED
I think I'll skip it and watch the original. Dakota Fanning is a phenominal actress for her age, but Tom Curise is just such a complete douche bag. All of his bullshit publicity stunts as of late make me want to avoid this movie purely out of spite.

:foreal: I couldn't have said it better. All of the Scientology bullsh!t and crap he's been talking just makes me want to punch him in the face. Did anyone catch the Matt Lauer interview?

AkimboStylee
07-01-2005, 01:21 PM
well he did say one thing i agree with, medication should not be used to for issues in the head, it is a treatment and not a cure, you should be spending money on research on trying to figure out how it happens, and how to fix it rather than a drug that subsides the "brain diesase"

GT40FIED
07-01-2005, 01:46 PM
Originally posted by AkimboStylee
well he did say one thing i agree with, medication should not be used to for issues in the head, it is a treatment and not a cure, you should be spending money on research on trying to figure out how it happens, and how to fix it rather than a drug that subsides the "brain diesase"

Right, but his logic is ridiculously flawed. He claimed to "know the history of psychiatry" which is bullshit because scientologists don't believe in it. Even if he had done research, as a scientologist he's only allowed to read scientology-approved books and materials. So essentially he knows what the church of scientology wants him to know (unless he wants to be labeled a "suppressor" and thus be subject to the fair game doctorine). I'm not saying I totally disagree with him, but he actually got all pissed off and acted like he knew what he was talking about. It's almost like you could visibly see L. Ron Hubbard's hand up Cruise's ass making him some scientology puppet. Fuck Tom Cruise. More importantly, fuck scientology.

AkimboStylee
07-01-2005, 04:56 PM
i dont care about that, what he said about taking medications is true 110% (drugs like riatlin, prozac, etc.)

ChrisCantSkate
07-01-2005, 07:43 PM
shit.. he's just some rich guy who has nothing better to do and people actually care about what he does. he is a good actor, thats why he's in his spot. bitching about how much you dont like him just gives him more power, think if someone you didnt give 2 shits about said you were a moron, or you make bad movies. aww you hurt my feelings im gonna speed back to my $15 million mansion in my ferrari and screw my hot mid 20 year old wife. personally i dont care for him at all, but he's done some entertaining(not life changing deep thought out movies, something you can stare at the TV for 2 hrs and be entertained) films. ive read the book, so if it follows the book, the movie would just be a visual aid to the story i already know. i figure with spielburg(sp?) directing it, it should at least be entertaining.

not singling anyone out, just playing devils advocate to everyone who dosnt like him:D

mylittlecivic
07-01-2005, 09:00 PM
It looks good, I liked the new batman. I couldnt bear to see mr and mrs smith I am way more sicker of brad pitt and angelina than i am of tom cruise and I work tabloids so i gota see their damn faces alot:crazy:

Kyle
07-01-2005, 09:28 PM
I just wanted to let everyone know...this movie has the worst ending in the world. It was horrible.

AkimboStylee
07-02-2005, 07:46 AM
did you understand it?

CD5Passion
07-02-2005, 08:48 PM
yeah i was expecting much more from that movie.
the graphics were spectacular, and dakota Fanning did a fantastic acting
Cruise could've done better
and yes the ending pissed me off lol

but other than that it was a entertaining movie

Kyle
07-02-2005, 09:10 PM
i have a question that may be a little spoiler. Was it small organisms that killed the aliens(mentioned something about that in the ending) or did they all start dying because tom cruise killed 1 of them?...that part kind of confused me.

CD5Passion
07-02-2005, 09:35 PM
....they die because of sickness..immune systems not familiar to our bacteria and germs

AkimboStylee
07-03-2005, 07:35 AM
We need to change the title to inform of spoilers!

and yes, if you notices the birds were all over one those, well birds carry a lot of disease, and thats how they knew to bring it down, because the birds were attacking it

Fatal070
07-03-2005, 09:30 AM
The movie was over hyped....

GT40FIED
07-03-2005, 12:51 PM
Originally posted by AkimboStylee
We need to change the title to inform of spoilers!

Done.

AkimboStylee
07-03-2005, 03:11 PM
thanks steve