Well I'd be screwed

[KwikR6]

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/02/09/low.pants.ap/index.html

[ChrisCantSkate]

thats retarted

[KwikR6]

Originally posted by ChrisCantSkate
thats retarted
yeah man...what a fucking joke...i would protest it saying I would rather wear my pants like this then have my nuts in a bunch

[GT40FIED]

I wear mine a little low...but no so much that half my ass is showing. To me, that just looks ridiculous. And what the fuck? People are offended because they can see someone's boxers? Have these people never seen underwear before? You KNOW it was a bunch of old-ass fucks with nothing better to do that thought this up. I got yer new bill right here, Virginia:flick:.

[CD5Passion]

hahah i think its funny. i mean i wear my pants alittle low but nothing like that.i see some people that come into my job woth their pants literally belted to their thighs...and it pisses me off lol

[mylittlecivic]

is that for real?:|

[GT40FIED]

Yep...I saw some little snippet on the news about it about a week ago.

[Mischief]

that is just plain ridiculous.. That's against constitutional rights.. You can dress how you want to, we're suppose to be free FFS. I'd just boycott pants all together and wear boxers everywhere..

[RxGoaT13]

thats just dumb,people should have the freedom to wear there pants anyway they want to.

[MissJDM]

It's funny how people complain about someone wearing their pants low, but if someone were to comlpain about a women wearing too low cut of shirts..it'd turn out to be some eye candied perverted crap.

[IALuder]

iowa is the same way. they see it as indecent exposer. they are trying to pass the bill as we speak. if it does pass its a 50 dollar ticket. oh well i dont care. ill just buy bigger shirts to cover it up.;)

[mavaaoife]

yah i saw something about this on the news.. its rediculous... i mean it takes away from a citizens constitutional rights.. but hey.. the freaken gov't come up with a new way to screw us over all the time..